Sole-Source Justification Guide

The University is required to publicly bid any purchase order (or contract) greater than $100,000.  If Federal funds are involved, competition is required for $10,000 and above. Sometimes, however, it doesn’t make sense for the University to bid because we don’t really have an option in who we buy from.  When this occurs, it is called a sole-source and we must document our sole-source justification. 

Writing a good sole-source justification documents how UCSF is making our procurement decisions and allows us to effectively respond to those who scrutinize what we buy; such as our Federal funding agencies and/or State auditors. 

Start here, your sole-source justification should answer these three basic questions:

  • What are the unique specifications/circumstances/requirements that are needed?
  • Why is this the only (sole) supplier/solution/product that meets the user's requirements?
  • Describe the due diligence that was performed in determining that this is the only solution to the user's need. In other words, how do you know there are no other solutions to your need?

A good source justification for non-federally funded procurement will generally fall into one of the catergories below:

For federally funded procurements, a sole source justification must fit into one of the categories below:

  • the item is available only from a single source
  • the public exigency or emergency for the requirement will not permit a delay resulting from competitive solicitation
  • the federal awarding agency or pass-through entity expressly authorizes noncompetitive proposals in response to a written request from the non-federal entity
  • after solicitation of a number of sources, competition is determined inadequate